I've been thinking about amnesty lately.
Do you think that I need to offer amnesty to things I am going to ban when I'm president? I'm pretty strongly against it. If I am wise enough to ban something stupid (like epilepsy, hot weather, thunder, and squirrels), why would I turn around and give the stupid thing amnesty. I want to be consistant...not stupid!
I'm ending with a picture of me as a pup in front of Fargo.
9 comments:
If you have declared something stupid enough to be illegal, then granting amnesty would be stupid.
-Magnum
Yes, I second Magnum.
What a cute picture!
Another vote for your stance on amnesty! Go Turbo!!!
PS - another vote for it being a cute picture too, but aren't you worried your opponents will use those pictures against you?
Ok, Love the photo!!! Super cute!
And yes, I agree on your stand on amnesty. Don't ban something and grant it amnesty!!!
Hugs,
Sitka
Thanks for your continued support, everyone.
Dakota, my photos are too cute to be used for anything negative!
There is absolutely no point in amnesty. Banning means it is banned, no second thoughts. That's something stupid that humans do.
Holly
Ditto! Banned things are gone for ever!
Steve
I'm totally against amnesty. Once something like hot weather is deemed stupid by you - it should be out forever!
The picture is KILLER cute, Tubes. Honestly.
Tail wags,
Storm
Post a Comment